More Likely To Commit More Crimes When you put a juvenile in a situation with seasoned criminals, such as adult prison, they are still impressionable and likely end up becoming involved in gang or other crime Juveniles should not be charged as.
When we consign our youth to the adult system, we are throwing away even that glimmer. In the same county as Williams, two other teens, Juan Castaneda and Eric Ramirez, are charged for first-degree murder in a crime spree that killed multiple people.
In fact, juvenile crime was already falling by the time states were tightening the screws. Sometimes this gets taken to extremes that most would find preposterous: He was only 14 years old. Just last week, a year-old boy in Missouri was charged with two counts of first-degree murder for killing his mother and stepfather.
Adults are not children.
In the last decade, virtually every state has made it much easier to try juveniles as adults. Incourts with juvenile jurisdiction handled an estimated 1. Our desire to ratchet up consequences is understandable. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us.
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, said the vast majority of teenagers, even young ones, know enough to be tried in adult court. Juvenile sentences, in contrast, shield our youth from the unique dangers of adult facilities and preserve the possibility — however slight it may seem — of rehabilitation.
A child is not an adult. The proceeding was no less solemn, no less tragic by reason of being in a juvenile court. A 10 year old boy who shows no remorse for his crime would still be given an extremely lax sentence because of his age. In November, Williams shot at a police officer in Omaha, Nebraska as he was being chased after being pulled over in a car with two other men.
By allowing them to be tried as adults, you give them the ability to have a trial by jury. Most young offenders do not become adult criminals. In some states, including Tennessee, there is now no minimum age for being transferred to criminal court for certain crimes.
In adult courts the sentencing is much harsher and the chance of getting off the hook with some counseling is very slim. Message of Lost Hope By giving juveniles extremely hard sentences, it gives the impression that there is no hope for their future and no hope of them ever becoming anything but a criminal and a convict.
According to one study, black men serve jail sentences that are twenty percent longer than white men for the same crime. If a juvenile is defined as a person under the age of 18, how can you justify trying them in a court designed for adult offenders?
This is why we historically have built in a small "safety valve," under which transfer arguably is appropriate for those very few offenders who are extremely close to the age cutoff and commit particularly awful crimes. Alex Hribal, the year-old knife-wielding student who attacked classmates and a security guard at a Pennsylvania high school last week, has been charged as an adult with four counts of attempted murder and 21 counts of aggravated assault.
Sentencing a year old to life in prison just seems morally unjust, especially when he has a high probability of turning his life around with some help.
If they do not have the moral compass instilled in them by that time, then they are very likely to commit more crimes. But a year-old is not an adult, and pressing charges as an adult does not change this fact. In juvenile courts there are no juries and no trials by jury either.
Teens tried as adults commit more crimes when released; their educational and employment prospects are markedly worse, creating opportunity and incentive for more crime; they bear a lifelong, potentially debilitating stigma. In a 12 year old girl killed her entire family for not approving of her boyfriend.
A year-old should then be able to smoke, drink, defend his country, participate as a juror, vote, create contracts, live independently of parental control, sue and make a will.
Put Young Offenders At High Risk One of the biggest problems of a young offender being tried as an adult is the fact that they could possibly be sent to an adult correctional facility. The current system is "so at odds with what the research tells us about the kids," said Marsha Levick, deputy director and co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center.
We want the world to be a better place. Maroney joined the Vanderbilt Law faculty as assistant professor in Fall Copyright The Associated Press This is the world we live in.Juveniles should deffinatley be tried as adults because, its not like they dont know what they are doing.
Now a days people are smarter than you think, with the increase in technology, you cant take anyone for granite. A year-old should then be able to smoke, drink, defend his country, participate as a juror, vote, create contracts, live independently of parental control, sue and make a will. Moreover, these studies show that trying juveniles in adult criminal court may actually result in higher rates of reoffending.
More and more. Juveniles should be treated as juveniles in the court justice system, with a focus on rehabilitating rather than simply punishing.
Keywords: litigation, children’s rights, juvenile crime, juvenile court, adult court, recidivism, court reform. 10 Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults The frequency of young kids committing horrendous crimes has been on a steady rise for the past couple of decades.
This has brought up a very controversial topic that people seem to be very passionate about, trying juvenile’s as adults. That, in a nutshell, is why children should not be tried as adults. The research is clear that children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to reoffend than if they are held in the juvenile justice system.Download